Trump vs. Musk: The $150 Billion Feud That's Reshaping American Business
The most powerful politician in the world and the richest person on the planet engaged in a spectacular public war of words this week, sending shockwaves through financial markets and raising fundamental questions about the intersection of politics and business in America. What began as a policy disagreement over President Donald Trump's tax legislation quickly devolved into personal attacks, threats to terminate billions in government contracts, and allegations involving Jeffrey Epstein files. The fallout has already cost Tesla shareholders $150 billion in market value and threatens to reshape the landscape of government contracting, political alliances, and corporate strategy across multiple industries.
The Unraveling of an Unlikely Alliance
The Trump-Musk partnership had always been an improbable alliance between two outsized personalities with history of combustible relationships. For nearly a year, Elon Musk wielded the full force of his $45 billion social media platform X to boost Trump's political ambitions, investing nearly $300 million in support of Trump and other Republicans during the election cycle. Musk's transformation from a figure who once supported Democrats to Trump's most prominent tech ally represented a significant political realignment that many viewed as mutually beneficial but inherently unstable.
During the early weeks of Trump's presidency, Musk appeared to hold unprecedented influence as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), leading aggressive initiatives to reduce federal spending and eliminate government agencies. The tech mogul seemed to have found his role as Trump's cost-cutting czar, with access to the Oval Office, Cabinet meetings, and even rides on Air Force One. When Musk's tenure as a "special government employee" concluded last week, the two shared what appeared to be a warm farewell, complete with a golden key to the White House.
However, beneath this surface cooperation lay fundamental tensions that business observers had long anticipated. As one analyst noted, few expected the relationship between "two influential and vocal billionaires" to last indefinitely, and the dramatic nature of their eventual split has confirmed those predictions.
The Spark That Ignited a Firestorm
The public rupture began on Tuesday, June 3, when Musk launched a scathing attack on Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" on X, calling it a "disgusting abomination" and warning it would "massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion". What initially appeared to be a policy disagreement quickly escalated when Trump responded during an Oval Office appearance on Thursday, expressing his disappointment with Musk's criticism.
Trump's comments revealed the personal nature of his frustration: "Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore". The president also disputed Musk's importance to his electoral success, claiming he "would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway" without Musk's support.
The situation rapidly deteriorated as both men took to their respective social media platforms. Musk responded with characteristic defiance, asserting "Without me, Trump would have lost the election" and labeling Trump "ungrateful" for his support. The exchanges became increasingly personal, with Musk eventually suggesting Trump should be impeached and making explosive allegations about Trump's presence in "Epstein files".
Immediate Market Catastrophe
The business world reacted swiftly and severely to the public feud. Tesla's stock plummeted 14.3% on Thursday, marking the company's worst single-day decline since March and erasing approximately $150 billion from its market capitalization. This massive selloff reflected investor panic about the potential consequences for Musk's business empire, particularly given the companies' extensive reliance on government contracts and favorable regulatory treatment.
The market reaction was "jaw-dropping and a shock to the market," according to Dan Ives, a senior equity analyst at Wedbush Securities and long-time Tesla supporter. The dramatic stock decline illustrated how intertwined Musk's business success has become with political relationships, particularly regarding Tesla's aspirations for autonomous vehicle approval and SpaceX's government contracts.
Tesla wasn't the only company affected by the fallout. Shares of SpaceX's competitors, including EchoStar and AST SpaceMobile, rose 16% and 8% respectively as investors began betting on alternative satellite networks gaining market share in the event of SpaceX contract cancellations. This redistribution of investor confidence demonstrates how political feuds can create both winners and losers across entire industries.
Government Contracts Under Threat
Perhaps the most immediate business risk comes from Trump's explicit threat to terminate Musk's government subsidies and contracts. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump posted on Truth Social. This threat puts an estimated $22 billion in SpaceX contracts at risk, along with various Tesla subsidies and incentives.
SpaceX has become particularly vulnerable due to its central role in America's space program. The company received $3.8 billion in fiscal year 2024 alone and serves as NASA's primary means of transporting astronauts to and from the International Space Station through its Dragon spacecraft. Musk's initial threat to "begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately" highlighted the potential chaos such a conflict could create for critical government operations, though he later walked back this statement.
The scope of potential contract cancellations extends beyond SpaceX's core launch services. The company's Starlink division was positioned to secure a multi-billion dollar Federal Aviation Administration contract to upgrade air traffic control communication systems. Additionally, SpaceX is developing classified intelligence satellite networks and a military version of Starlink called Starshield, making it deeply embedded in national security infrastructure.
For Tesla, the threat involves both direct subsidies and broader regulatory support. The elimination of electric vehicle tax credits could cost Tesla an estimated $1.2 billion, according to JPMorgan Chase analysis. However, the more significant long-term risk may be regulatory approval for Tesla's Full Self-Driving technology, which investors had viewed as more likely under a Trump administration friendly to Musk.
Political Ramifications and Industry Realignment
The Trump-Musk split carries implications far beyond the immediate business impacts. The feud threatens Republican unity at a critical time, with Musk potentially providing both rhetorical and financial support to congressional Republicans who oppose Trump's agenda. Given Musk's comment that "Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years," the tech mogul appears positioned for a long-term political conflict.
This political realignment could have profound effects on the broader tech industry's relationship with government. Musk's transformation from Trump ally to critic demonstrates the volatility of political partnerships in an era where tech leaders wield unprecedented influence. Other technology executives are likely reassessing their own political strategies in light of how quickly circumstances can change.
The conflict also raises questions about the concentration of critical infrastructure in the hands of a few powerful individuals. Former NASA deputy administrator Lori Garver criticized the situation, stating that "a rogue CEO threatening to decommission spacecraft, putting astronauts' lives at risk, is untenable". This criticism highlights broader concerns about the privatization of essential government functions and the leverage that private contractors can wield over public policy.
Strategic Implications for Corporate America
The Trump-Musk feud offers several critical lessons for business leaders navigating the intersection of politics and commerce. First, it demonstrates the risks of building business strategies around personal relationships with political figures. Musk's companies had become heavily dependent not just on government contracts, but on maintaining favorable relationships with specific political leaders.
The speed with which the relationship deteriorated also illustrates the volatility inherent in politically-dependent business models. As Bill George, former CEO of Medtronic and Harvard Business School executive fellow, advised: "Never engage in conflict with the president of the United States. The repercussions for your business can be significant".
Corporate leaders are also witnessing how social media can amplify business risks in the political arena. Both Trump and Musk used their platforms to escalate the conflict, with Musk leveraging his 220 million X followers to attack the president directly. This dynamic suggests that companies must consider not just traditional political risks, but also the potential for social media-driven conflicts to spiral out of control.
Looking Forward: Reconciliation or Continued Conflict
As of Friday morning, there were early signs that both sides might be open to de-escalation. Politico reported that White House aides had scheduled a call between Trump and Musk for Friday, while Musk responded positively to billionaire Bill Ackman's suggestion that the two should "make peace for the benefit of our country". However, the depth of the personal animosity displayed in their public exchanges suggests that any reconciliation may be temporary.
The business community appears largely supportive of efforts to end the feud. Business leaders have expressed alarm at the "chaos and unpredictability" created by the conflict, with many checking their phones between meetings to follow the developing drama. The Leadership Now Project's CEO Daniella Ballou-Aares noted that while business leaders initially found humor in the clash, their amusement quickly turned to worry as the confrontation intensified.
For investors and business leaders, the Trump-Musk conflict serves as a stark reminder of the risks associated with the increasing politicization of business relationships. The $150 billion loss in Tesla's market value represents not just the cost of this particular feud, but a warning about the potential volatility that can result when business strategy becomes too closely aligned with political relationships. Whether this conflict leads to lasting changes in how companies approach government relations, or simply serves as a temporary disruption in an otherwise stable alliance, will likely determine its ultimate significance for American business.
The resolution of this conflict will also set important precedents for how disputes between powerful political and business figures play out in the social media age, potentially influencing corporate governance, government contracting, and the broader relationship between technology companies and federal agencies for years to come.
Sources:
Reuters. (2025, June 6). Trump is not interested in talking to Musk as they feud over tax-cut bill. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-musk-bromance-descends-into-brawl-over-contracts-impeachment-2025-06-06/
Reuters. (2025, June 5). Trump-Musk row slams Tesla shares, $150 billion in market value wiped out. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-shares-slide-musk-steps-up-criticism-ally-trump-2025-06-05/
NBC News. (2025, June 5). Tesla shares rebound amid broader market surge as Musk versus Trump spat pauses. Retrieved from https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/tesla-shares-sink-musk-trump-ridicule-rcna211244
Reuters. (2025, June 5). Musk-Trump breakup puts $22 billion of SpaceX contracts at risk, jolting US space program. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/spacex-will-decommission-dragon-spacecraft-musk-says-feud-with-trump-escalates-2025-06-05/
CNN. (2025, June 6). Elon Musk’s deep dive into politics was bad for business. His breakup with Trump could hurt even worse. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/06/business/musk-trump-tesla-stock
Yahoo Finance. (2025, June 6). Tesla stock rebounds after Trump-Musk blowup leads to $150 billion wipeout. Retrieved from https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tesla-stock-rebounds-after-trump-musk-blowup-leads-to-150-billion-wipeout-133120714.html
Associated Press. (2025, June 5). Investors dump Tesla stock following war of words between Elon Musk and Donald Trump. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/musk-tesla-robotaxi-trump-tax-bill-budget-359f8ddd3739793b3c5e8ab92d191879
